Tash (angelic_1) wrote in babiesjune2006,
Tash
angelic_1
babiesjune2006

  • Mood:

It's a...



~~ GIRL ~~


Well at least the technician said there were 20-1 odds of it being a girl. Baby Jane opened her legs nicely (very unladylike) for us and there was a pretty good view between them. There was no indication of a penis or testes but then they thought Jonathan was a girl too so I will hold my breath a little bit. I am more confident this time though. I just had this feeling.

We are nicknaming her Baby Jane but her full and official name is Danielle Jamie Khoo

As for twins - nope! There was only one in there. We had a good look for a second but they weren't to be found. Seems that my uterus must just not have shrunk down properly after Jonathan because baby is exactly to date.

I will post pics once I (dirtbirdGeoff) extract them from the DVD we took of it all.

So glad that is over!
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
  • 1 comment